Prairie Fires Readalong – As a Farm Woman Thinks | Beyond Little House

A couple months ago, our minister began her sermon by saying that it is common to hear “They had more time in the old days, even referring to the pioneers” My best friend gave me a pointed look to which I responded that Laura Ingalls Wilder had actually written an article saying as much and how it wasn’t true in the Missouri Ruralist approximately 100 years ago. She laughed, and I sent her copies of the article after church. Laura’s magazine writings are in the chapter we are discussing today.

The chapter includes discussion on the trip to San Francisco, where I would love to see the buildings as Laura saw them. Despite my pleas, our one day in San Francisco when I was 11, my parents didn’t spend it hunting down maybe still standing buildings. Which Laura site do you most want to see as it was in the books? Should we plan a trip?
 
And we delve into both Laura and Rose’s writing, and truth. Rather than reflect on how well that would still fit today regarding the news, I’ll ask if anyone has read one of Rose’s “biographies?” I read the one on Henry Ford. My Dad worked skilled trades for Ford for over 40 years, and we have been to Greenfield Village countless times. There were claims about Ford, which even The Henry Ford doesn’t make! Henry wasn’t the fan of unionization that Rose paints, even if today it is a strong partnership. His childhood sounded more like Rose’s than anything else. I found myself making many remarks towards the author repeatedly.

Lastly, the book discusses Rose and Laura – a subject that we all have strong opinions. I’m an internal auditor with no background to start, but I am an only child. I have never read anyone who has looked into the relationship through that lens. When Laura was seven or so, she may have been sliding down a hay stack with Mary while Charles and Caroline discussed their finances. However with Rose – she was in the wagon or around the dinner table less sheltered from the discussions and likely freer to speak. I would love to read someone who didn’t just dismiss it as “all only children are spoiled brats” (by the way when you are an only child, people will say this to your face) but to consider it as a research project.

Posted in Missouri Ruralist, Prairie Fires, Rose Wilder Lane, Writings About Laura, Writings and Works

Prairie Fires Readalong – A World Made | Beyond Little House

One thing that has made reading this book both exciting and humbling for me so far is the fact that Fraser’s vocabulary exceeds mine by leaps and bounds. I just finished writing my doctoral dissertation, so I’d hardly consider myself a lexically challenged simpleton. However, I find myself needing to stop and look up words frequently, sometimes at the rate of once or twice per page. As a fun exercise in admiration for the author, I thought I’d log all the words I had to look up in this chapter along with their definitions. To quote a popular expression, “Yo, don’t judge.”

  • Penury: severe poverty, lack of resources, or extreme frugality
  • Laconically: using a minimum of words, concise to the point of seeming rude or mysterious
  • Redound: to have an effect, either for good or for bad
  • Abject: experienced to the maximum degree
  • Sortie: an attack
  • Sardonic: mocking, humorous in an unkind manner
  • Drayman: one who hauls goods for a living
  • Stultifying: causing to seem stupid, impairing, or inhibiting
  • Phaeton: a type of open carriage pulled by two horses
  • Fabulism: giving false accounts of things
  • Inchoate: not yet fully-formed, rudimentary

Now that this brief return to my high school English class days is over, on with the chapter.

It hadn’t struck me until reading in this book how much actions as minor as plowing fields and planting crops can change the climate of an area. The climate change we talk about today seems so much bigger than the one that caused the Wilders to leave South Dakota, but the era and lack of technology made even small changes have larger repercussions. I knew of the Dust Bowl and other tough periods for American heartland farmers, but not until reading this book did I understand that “the great plow-up,” as Ken Burns called it in his Dust Bowl documentary, was really a sham to begin with.

It’s hard for me not to think that Rose’s description of Laura’s teary goodbye to Dakota was romanticized to the point where it is far from the truth. First, did Almanzo ever address her as “Laura?” If he did, that would be news to me. Second, it contrasts so greatly with the tone of her diary about the same part of their trip.

On the topic of Rose, this seems to be a point at which the book shifts more from her mother’s writings to hers. When my wife, Karen, finished this book, she was left with a really bad taste for Rose, and I am starting to see why I have heard so many Wilder scholars and fans say things like: “I don’t like her.” “She was so angry at the world.” In this chapter, I see such hypocrisy in her disdain for the “barefooted mountain girls,” at her school in Mansfield, when her own family had so little themselves when they first moved there. I guess it’s part of human nature or maybe specifically a part of American culture to look down on others as a way to feel better about our own lots in life. I guess one doesn’t feel as helpless if one can say, “It could be worse. I could be like those people.”

The description of Charles’s death makes me reflect on his life and come to some mixed conclusions. As many others have noted, it seems like he never got to live out his dream of homesteading and farming the land. By the time he finally had the land that is the Ingalls Homestead today, he left it, moved to town, and worked there. As I previously mentioned, one feels like the entire Homestead Act was was a big sham. However, according to Laura’s writing, the constant moving and satisfying his wanderlust were what kept Charles happy. Even if he had raised bumper crops in Kansas or Minnesota, that might not have been as fulfilling as the life he had.

The disdain for Rose being said, Fraser’s description of her senior year of high school makes her sound like an interesting person. It seems like she reserved her scorn for her family and lumped them in with the country bumpkins of Mansfield, but gave the rest of the world a chance.

I love Fraser’s description of newspapers in the early 20th century: “Journalistic standards regarding accuracy, attention to detail, and proper sourcing mattered little.” It’s so similar to the “clickbait” and “fake news” with which the world is struggling so much today.

In closing, as someone who has never read On the Way Home and has read only parts of West From Home, this was an enlightening chapter about times in Laura’s life that the other books do not cover. We see how economic stability and new opportunities for women during the changing social times allowed Laura to discover her true gifts as an author.

PS. I can’t help reading about the large picture windows in the Rocky Ridge farmhouse without chuckling about the “Divorce, Walnut Grove Style” episode of the show. That episode’s cheezy running gag involves Charles buying a similar window that keeps getting broken. I apologize to all the book purists whose ire I just drew and whose bonnets I just got in a wad.

Posted in Cultural Impact, On the Way Home, Prairie Fires, Rose Wilder Lane, Television series — Little House on the Prairie, West from Home

Prairie Fires Readalong – Don’t Leave the Farm Boys | Beyond Little House

I have to admit, I feel a bit like Laura as she is writing her composition on “Ambition” not quite sure what angle to take on my chapter, nor whether or not I’m doing it “correctly”…. that said let’s delve into Chapter 5. 

After her marriage to Almanzo, the new couple started their married life in a brand-new home Almanzo had built.  The details described by Laura make it very clear that he had put a lot of time and effort into the new home to make his new wife happy – happy in marrying him and hopefully keeping her happy as a “farmers wife” 

Chapter 5 (Aug 1885 – May 1894) is “The First 4 Years” more or less and a sneak peak at “The Long Way Home.”  As a young and old reader of “The First 4 Years” I was inclined to think…. ah…. all’s well that ends well.   Not quite …it is a recurring theme in Wilder’s life that things just never go quite as you’d want them to go.  The endless financial grind is almost tiring to read – how is it that she and Almanzo as well as her extended family could constantly be in a financial tight spot?  The answer of course is the path they chose – going to South Dakota and betting on farming in a land that quite frankly wasn’t really meant to be farmed. 

A glance back at Fraser’s 4th chapter gives background to what got so many Great Plains farmers/ homesteaders into a bind – the land was essentially parched and more suited to grazing – even Thomas Jefferson had made that observation.  At one point there was discussion to take raising crops from the Homesteaders Act and replace it with grazing….in hindsight that might have kept the Wilders and Pa, for that matter, out of their constant financial desperation. 

The Chicago and North Western and Union Pacific railroads were two of the major propaganda outlets for getting people to move west.  They promised “Fertile Prairies Lands” and distributed mouthwatering illustrated broadsides of bonanza crops.

The Ingalls unluckily settled in the Dakota area at the line where the land became considerably drier than Minnesota – 15-23 inches annually, if they were lucky.

When we fast forward to the newly formed Wilder family, Almanzo had started married life in debt (without telling his new wife) and seemingly basing his expectations on what he knew of his father’s farm in Minnesota – hard work would pay off.  As witnessed in the entire chapter, no amount of hard work seemed to make things right for the Wilders.

I think that of all the stretches of Laura’s life that we are familiar with, the first years of her marriage until the family’s departure for Missouri had to have been the most difficult.  Each year seemed to bring a new level of financial strain to the point of desperation, illness, poor crops and death.

In an overview of the chapter, not once was there any decent crop – nothing that put them ahead financially.  Fortunately, they were able to rent the “bright and shining house” after their first anniversary and move into a one room claim shanty that saw the birth of their daughter Rose in December 1886.  The long-time family friends the Boasts offered to raise Rose as their own not too long after her birth which of course shocked Laura and Almanzo and no doubt put a strain (!) on their relationship from then out.

To add insult to injury both Almanzo and Laura were stricken with diphtheria in 1888. Rose was spared and spent time in town with her aunts and grandparents.  Laura recovered, but Almanzo was left crippled and their relationship was forever altered by his incapacity.  You have to wonder how often she asked, “what if?” when she thought of the fact that “he had disregarded the doctor’s warning and worked too hard.”

Again for the next couple of years, the crops failed or did poorly and the Wilders remained in a tight financial situation.  It was a stroke of good fortune (which seemed to be in limited supply) that Laura’s cousin Peter asked her to go in on a sheep investment. Laura had the money from a horse she had sold, and the sheep were purchased for $2 a head.  Between Peter and Almanzo the sheep were cared for; the young trees were tended to and plans to break more ground the following fall were made. 

Again, pregnant in 1889 the now trio of Peter, Laura and Almanzo struggled with Mother Nature in the form of a dust storm strong enough to knock the sheep off their feet.  Of course, said storm blew away their newly sown wheat that had to be repurchased and replanted.  Sensing a theme?

In what should have been good news, the sheep’s wool sold for 25c a pound and would have been a tidy profit, but it went back into buying the blown away seed replacement.

That spring and summer went from bad to worse – the weather yet again dried up the crops, produced cyclones and in July the birth of Laura’s son went from bright spot to yet another sad moment in the death of their unnamed baby August 7th.  I’ve wondered, and fellow Laura friends have all wondered why in the world that child hadn’t been named…. were the Wilders so beaten down they didn’t even bother to name a child?  Especially a son?

At this point, I’d like to stop parsing the chapter and add a thought or two of my own.

In the approximately ten years that Laura and Almanzo were in DeSmet as a married couple, they truly had minimal “good luck.”  They subsisted, but there was never an appearance of things “getting better.”  I have wondered more than once, especially at the “7-year itch” mark – what the heck were they both thinking?  Obviously, divorce wasn’t much of an option – there wasn’t enough money to live separately and there was a young child that needed both parents.  Who went into the field and screamed?  Did Laura just look at the years of “Ma “isms” and find an appropriate saying to get her over a rough spot?  She had her family, of course and sisters to vent to, but I’m not so sure that that would have been an option.  Almanzo had Royal so perhaps he played A LOT of checkers.

In our world there are plenty of outlets to find some help either financially or mental health……they had neither.

Fortunately, after a rather disastrous trip to Florida in part pushed by yet more creative advertising and a stay in Minnesota with Almanzo’s family, the family returned to De Smet to regroup yet again.  Rose was in school, Laura was sewing and Almanzo was picking up odd jobs.  Again, there doesn’t seem to discontent – according to Rose they didn’t expect much in this world and were happy for what they had. 

Rose grew to school age and the family existed in DeSmet – there really was no money to get them to any place better.  Again, I have to wonder what the general atmosphere was like around the table at night…. guessing there was a lot of “finding a silver lining” going on in the years 1892-94.  The Panic of 1893 was nationwide, so the Wilders and Ingalls families were not struggling alone, a run on gold, collapsing crop prices and railroad overinvestment his everyone in one way or another.

Right when you begin to wonder if anything will ever be halfway hopeful, yet another move was made under the influence of word of mouth and notices in newspapers urging folks to “Go South.”  The illustrated 53-page book “Among The Ozarks: The land of the Big Red Apples” and the first-hand testimony of a family friend convinced the Wilders to pack up and make the 670-mile trip to Mansfield, MO …. noted for land that was said to have Biblical properties.  Quite frankly, after the semi-hellish climate of Dakota, the temptation of property claiming to have been the garden of Eden must have been hard to resist.

As with the book written by Wilder, Fraser’s description of the departure of Laura from DeSmet caught me with something in my eye – did anyone have any inkling that it would be years before she was to visit?  The promise of the fiddle after Pa’s death… that was a huge gift – many a chapter in her future books and no doubt many nights did the fiddle play an important part in the family.

For myself, Fraser’s book was a bit of a tough read.  The level of detail and historical asides was enough to really force you or at least me to really sit and concentrate on what I was reading.  That said, I loved it and was fortunate to meet her again in Tulsa when she visited in October. 

Posted in Almanzo Wilder, Pa's Fiddle, Prairie Fires, The First Four Years, West from Home

Prairie Fires Readalong – God Hates a Coward | Beyond Little House

This chapter speaks to me, in a way that probably most of you can identify. It explains the growth and the shift of Laura’s perspective: from early teens to newlywed.  This chapter really highlights the last 4 books (have you read the readalongs on this site?) of the original 8 book set “The DeSmet Years” – By The Shores of Silver Lake, The Long Winter, Little Town on the Prairie and These Happy Golden Years.  

My Little Town Perspective

Before I delve much further, I need to explain my personal association with this section.  In July 1985, my mother, one of her friends, her daughter and I roadtripped to DeSmet. One of my favorite memories was traveling Highway 14. You see, 20 miles east of DeSmet is Arlington, SD.  As we were from Arlington, MN, the town itself made all of us ladies in the car giggle; after all, it seemed smaller than my Arlington (for perspective – Arlington SD ‘s population was posted on a sign that said Arlington was home to “999 happy people… and 1 grouch”).  In DeSmet, we went to the Surveyors House, ate at the Oxbow, went swimming at the pool (with a really HIGH diving board), saw the pageant – Little Town on the Prairie – they handed out name cards to all of the kids and then we went home. It was memorable and fun, but not the way I would explore the “Little Town” in the future.  

Twin Lakes Road, Kingsbury County, SD

10 summers later, I traveled to Kingsbury County for an entirely different reason. Anyone who has been in a long term relationship and “met the parents” for the first time, can empathize with that experience so clearly. My boyfriend, Dave, was from Arlington, SD, and his last name was Manley.  All giggles aside, do you think it was a coincidence? I don’t. It was the first of dozens of trips to eastern South Dakota. On Christmas Day morning, 1996, on our way between the Arlingtons (165 miles on the same road with only one 4 mile turn), the snow was much higher than our little Saturn and we literally drove through tunnels of snow drifts higher than the car roof in western MN. All you could see was packed snow around the vehicle. Does that remind anyone of the railroad master and his decision to stop running the trains? It resonated with me all the way to SD. Anyway, because I married my South Dakota Manley, I had access to visit DeSmet almost any time I wanted to, in any season. In 2007, I started reading more about Laura’s life; the biographies, the poetry, the backstories of the characters in the books and started taking “excursions”. Sometimes it was to leave our young boys with my in-laws, but mostly because I started owning my passion for Laura’s DeSmet and took advantage of the opportunity to indulge my curiosity. I hunted down what was left of Silver Lake, I drove the gravel roads and went to Ingalls homesite multiple times, however, I didn’t realize how much I didn’t know.

Make New Friends, But Keep the Old

I think the reason why this section of Prairie Fires seems to have less to uncover (or maybe fewer ah-ha moments for me) is because Laura remembered this part of her life with more clarity than with the first 4 books and didn’t have to rely on the memories of others. She is more grown-up and she witnesses the railroads establishing towns and participates in making DeSmet a thriving community. In these books there is more blurring of the lines between Laura the character and autobiographical nature of Laura the author. The memories of dating, friends, school, drama, first love, first party, first job are all very clear in my mind, and I think they were in Laura’s, too.   

Fraser basically doesn’t really expand in this section much more beyond what Laura wrote in these books. There are a few things, such as the huge omission of George and Margaret Masters living in the Ingalls’ home during the Long Winter. Sure, some dates are changed, for example Laura didn’t start teaching at 15. But by and large the majority of these 4 books are true: the Hard Winter did really happen, Mary Ingalls did go to college, Almanzo Wilder and Cap Garland bought seed wheat to keep the town of DeSmet from starving to death, tornadoes did touch down, wolves occupied a den near Silver Lake, Nellie Oleson (Stella Gilbert) tried to nose her way into Laura and Almanzo’s relationship, and Eliza Jane really struggled to teach and discipline Laura and Carrie at school.

Laura’s memories of school, peer pressure (autograph books/name cards) riding in the cutter and buggy with Almanzo, learning to manage her classrooms, and her growing maturity still resonate with today’s readers, younger and older. How many of us still need to heed Pa’s advice to think before speaking? I am still working on that one, how about you? 

Laurapalooza attendees enthusiastically hunt for the Wilder Tree Claim July 2015

One of the best things about being involved with LIWLRA is meeting other members who have internalized Laura’s words and want to see the things she saw. One of my favorite post-Laurapalooza memories was visiting DeSmet and seeing it through the eyes of my friends. Wanting to hunt down Almanzo’s tree claim or find the location of the Bouchie school or even understanding the significance of walking Twin Lakes Road, makes these experiences so much richer than my solo excursions. And guess what? My hubby and in-laws think my passion for all things Laura is pretty cool, too.

DeSmet and Kingsbury County are full of good memories, for me and for Laura. If you are ever traveling to DeSmet and going through Arlington, I will gladly suggest places to check out. So I am going to end this blog post with the same “happily ever after” sentiment that Laura had at the end of These Happy Golden Years.

This section of Prairie Fires is about building a community and Laura’s maturing place within it. My wish  this holiday season is that you find your community and place: within the books, within LIWLRA, at Laurapalooza 2019 and feel the peace & contentment that Laura has in her family, her town, in her relationship and with her little gray home in the west. 

Posted in By The Shores of Silver Lake, LauraPalooza 2019, Little Town on the Prairie, Prairie Fires, The Long Winter, These Happy Golden Years, Uncategorized

Prairie Fires Readalong – Crying Hard Times | Beyond Little House

My favorite Little House book has always been “On the Banks of Plum Creek”.  As a child, I thought living in a dugout was quite fascinating and romantic.  I never thought about bugs crawling down the walls or mud falling in the food you were cooking.  When I played “Little House” with my friends we reenacted living in the dugout or in the Wonderful House complete with a cast iron stove that was in the basement of my friend’s home.  I remember visiting the museum at Rocky Ridge when I was 13, the year that the T.V. movie was made, and seeing the little china box that Laura talked about receiving at the church Christmas social.  I was enthralled.  In fact, of all my Wilder artifacts, my similar fairing trinket box is one of my most prized.  The horror of the grasshopper invasion never sank in when I was a child.  I preferred to cheer Laura on when she lured the wicked Nellie into the leech and crab infested Plum Creek.  I never thought about the harshness of the reality of Wilder’s life.  In fact, for much of my adult life, I romanticized the life of the Ingalls family, only becoming aware of the cruelty of their poverty as I began to read and research about the real life of Laura Ingalls Wilder.

Chapter Three of “Prairie Fires”, Crying Hard Times, paints a very clear picture of the series of unfortunate events that befell the Ingalls family.  This chapter covers the Ingalls move to Walnut Grove, Minnesota in 1874 and their subsequent move to Burr Oak, Iowa and back again to Walnut Grove.  There is a great deal to read in this chapter as in all of the book but I found that much of it is covered very similarly in the annotations to “Pioneer Girl” by Laura Ingalls Wilder, edited by Pamela Smith Hill. It is heartbreaking stuff if you spend any time thinking about the effect of all of the loss suffered by the Ingalls family.  I can only imagine the trauma of it all. Yet the family persevered and 50 years later when Laura wrote about those days, she chose to paint a picture of self-reliance, cheerfulness, persistence and survival.

I did find Fraser’s section on the Grasshopper plague to be interesting.  The enormity of the swarm of Rocky Mountain Locust defies imagination.  According to one meteorologist named Albert Child, the swarm was 110 miles wide, 1800 miles long and a quarter to half mile in depth.  The covered 198,000 miles from Canada to Texas leaving devastation in their wake.  Indeed, in my home state of Kansas, there are monuments, statues and tales about the locust still in existence today.  The mortar of a church in a town near my home contains preserved carcasses of these destructive insects.  Fraser discusses the futile attempts of farmers to find a way to eradicate the locust, the destruction they left behind and the pitiful response of state governments and social aid for the devastated, starving farm families.  The account is quite enlightening.

Overall, I was left wondering about Charles Ingalls.  He could not help or prevent the many crises that befell his family.  Most of the would be consider acts of God.  The grasshopper plague, the illness of his wife, the birth and death of a son, the doctor bills, promises reneged and the long, drawn out illness of his eldest child were certainly beyond his control.  However, the question I was left with and that was not answered in “Prairie Fires” was why Pa didn’t backtrail and go home to Pepin.  I understand that land and jobs were scarce back home but they had family there.  Wouldn’t some part of their extended family take them in while they healed and got back on their feet?  Why did Pa insist on staying in Walnut Grove, even returning to it after success eluded them in Burr Oak.  Was it stubbornness?  Misguided hope? Self-reliance? Pride? Lack of resources?  I think we can speculate but I don’t think we can ever know for sure.  What do you think?

Posted in On the Banks of Plum Creek, Prairie Fires, Writings About Laura

Prairie Fires Readalong – Indian Summers | Beyond Little House

Prairie Fires presents a vast amount of information, which can make some members hesitate in participating in the readalong.  If you’re feeling intimidated, it might be because you’ve been lulled into the belief that an attempt at narrative nonfiction must be a “difficult” read. Here’s where I’m going to try and ease your fears: no one, but NO ONE, can possibly know everything about any topic, and EVERYONE has a right to digest, pick apart, respond, praise, or question what they read, about Laura Ingalls Wilder. You don’t have to be a fan or an expert or even a historian to get something out of Caroline Fraser’s book. You don’t have to read the footnotes (pro tip: read one chapter at a time and ignore the footnotes until you re-read a passage that still has you wondering by the end of the chapter. You’ll thank me later.) Taken as a whole, Prairie Fires may easily become your most beloved or most feared read and that’s okay. So far, I’m undecided, but keeping an open mind.

    Full disclosure: I’ve studied Laura Ingalls Wilder’s historical context for decades, and for the last eight years, I’ve presented living history programs as an adult, but not-yet-famous Laura, circa the late 1890s. These programs are fully in-character, and interactive. From the first moments of each presentation, I invite the audience to pose questions to, and raise topics of discussion with, “Mrs. Wilder.” In these presentations, certain questions come up almost every time. Among them, my top two most asked questions are undoubtedly: “Why did you move so much?” and, perhaps most chillingly, “Why does Ma hate the Indians?”

    As fans, admirers, historians, and readers who discuss Laura, we must be very careful in our assumptions. We must remember that: Laura’s works are fiction, her memoirs and novels are not history, and her perspective as an individual whose interactions with cultures other than her own were extremely limited. We must remember that the incidents she fictionalized in her novels took place during her childhood and were heavily influenced by the adults around her. We can’t know everything, and we certainly don’t have all the documentation to prove or disprove any given theory. We KNOW that many records have not survived, and we KNOW that a lack of evidence doesn’t guarantee something didn’t happen. We must be mindful of our biases and our own lack of background and context before we take our speculations too far down any one road.

    Chapter two, “Indian Summers,” concerns the Ingalls family’s time in Missouri and Kansas, when Laura was between the ages of two and four. Of course, toddler Laura couldn’t possibly have any knowledge of the family’s real estate transactions, legal status, or intentions in relocating. Adult Laura may or may not have considered the implications of her father’s decision to attempt settlement in the Osage Diminished Reserve when it was not open to settlement for homesteaders, nor could she take any responsibility for the decision to become squatters. But we, as readers and admirers of Laura, certainly can consider these things.   

    In her assessment of this chapter in Laura’s life, Caroline Fraser attempts to dissect some of the questions many readers and scholars have asked: when, why, and how did the family make this move, and what motivated Charles and Caroline (and Henry, Polly, and Tom Quiner) to take up land in Missouri? She uses anecdotal evidence to explain why they gave it up almost as quickly, then discusses how the Ingalls family moved on to Kansas. Unfortunately, some pertinent details seem to be sourced from accounts of overland travel that occurred in an earlier generation and considerably west of the region concerned in the Ingalls family’s travels.

This may seem trivial, but I promise, it matters. Laura herself was guilty of a similar infraction when she wrote Farmer Boy. I don’t know why Fraser did it, but I can say with confidence that Laura as author was employing literary device to evoke a sense of greater distance between the past (1860s northern New York state and Almanzo’s youth) and the present (Depression-Era America circa 1933). Perhaps Fraser’s use of slightly outmoded accounts rather than those at the same time as Laura’s childhood was an oversight or unfamiliarity with the nuances in time and place that greatly affected the outcome. It’s a simple mistake to make. Did Fraser seek (inadvertently or otherwise) to perpetuate the myth of isolation and independence that Laura and Rose clung to? Probably not. Still, I’m keeping it in the back of my mind as I continue to read.

    There is one detail of the journey that most certainly is off: the assumed lack of travel companions. Having spent decades studying primary documents and innumerable secondary accounts of overland travel spanning most of the 19th century I find it highly unlikely that Charles and Caroline Ingalls ventured to Missouri from Wisconsin alone. The sheer peril of a family traveling such great distance by covered wagon and alone—at any point in the 19th century—was ill-advised and rare. If the Ingalls were alone at some point for a few days, I would not be surprised, particularly if an intended destination was only a few miles from the stopping place of one’s companions. Even then, hazards ranging from broken wagon axles and highway robbers to river crossings, tainted water  and venomous snake bites were very real risks. Two adults traveling with small children and a full wagon would be hard-pressed to overcome hazards like these without help; a month-long journey from Wisconsin to Missouri without additional adult companions and an abundance of supplies would be a fool’s errand. I have a difficult time believing Charles or Caroline would be so reckless as to attempt it.

    Furthermore, given all the discussion about the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862 and the ensuing fears (justified or not) that it inspired in white settlers, how exactly can we reconcile the idea that a family would venture overland alone for weeks at a time in the middle of disputed territory they knew belonged to Osage people? I’m having trouble understanding that logic. To Fraser’s credit, she explains the intricacies of the dispute surrounding the Sturges Treaty negotiations, perhaps more rightly called manipulations, and she cites various sources that go into greater detail. Incidentally, my favorite article on the matter is Penny T. Linsenmeyer’s “Kansas Settlers on the Osage Diminished Reserve,” which appeared in the Autumn 2001 issue of Kansas History. Linsenmeyer digs deep into the origins and extended negotiation of the Sturges Treaty using a wide range of primary sources. The article sheds light on a topic of perennial controversy in the Little House series as it presents a good deal more evidence of Osage side of the story, engendering empathy in the reader by the use of cold, hard, ugly facts.

    I prefer this approach to the reliance upon Laura’s memoirs that so many fans and biographers alike have deferred, and which Fraser herself cites. In her discussion of Kansas, Fraser states: “virtually everything known about the family’s experience in Kansas derives from the first twenty pages of a memoir found among Wilder’s papers, handwritten in 1930 on six dime-store tablets” (pg. 53). Fraser is, of course, referring to Pioneer Girl. I take exception to this, as the timeline alone (remember, Laura was a toddler in Kansas!) belies the authenticity of that part of the memoir. It’s a slippery slope and could make for further perpetuation of the myth that Laura’s work is a document of history. Of course, in terms of the Ingalls family’s particular experience, the memoir is virtually the only source we have, and that makes for an uphill climb when seeking the historical truth. I admire Fraser for the attempt, and am looking forward to seeing how her use of the memoir in conjunction with her research plays out for the balance of Prairie Fires. There is SO much to talk about!

History Geek with a Silly Streak.

Posted in Prairie Fires, Writings About Laura

Prairie Fires Readalong – Maiden Rock | Beyond Little House

Rich people are easy to write about. They tend to leave a legacy – letters, photographs, records of their lives. Poor people, on the other hand, leave little behind – a family Bible, maybe, a cherished photo or two. This, Caroline Fraser says in Chapter One, Maiden Rock, means researchers and writers turn into detectives to determine all the pieces of the puzzle.

Charles Ingalls and the pioneers like him were just trying to survive as they moved from place to place. There was no room for a box of diaries or stacks of love letters. When you think about it, it’s pretty incredible – and a statement about Caroline’s personality – that they traveled with her old school readers and the big green book. How many other things were left behind that didn’t fit into the wagon? (On the other hand, how many things did they actually save only to have destroyed decades later?)

Here’s a little of what we know. Laura’s paternal lineage landed in the new world in 1628, with the arrival of Edmund. Like the generations to follow, Edmund struggled to become prosperous in this new land. One of Edmund’s granddaughters was hung in 1692 during the Salem witchcraft trials. The early Ingalls generations had the same itchy foot that Charles had.  They moved from New England, to Canada to Cuba, NY. From there they moved to Elgin, Illinois and then to Jefferson county Wisconsin, near the village of Concord. This is where Charles and Caroline’s paths would converge. 

Laura’s great-grandfather, Samuel, was a published writer in a family that would produce many story tellers and writers in future generations.  In 1825 he published his Rhymes of “The Unlearned Poet”. Let’s not forget that Laura thought that her father was an incredible story teller (all the stories of his childhood weaved through the pages of LHITBW).  Laura’s mother was also a wordsmith. She wrote an essay. ‘The Ocean’ that details her biological father’s death, that still survives today. She became a school teacher and named her first born daughter after her own school teacher, Mary J. Moore. She also saved her schoolbooks to teach her own children as they crossed the prairies.   

Maiden Rock is the chapter that takes us on the original journey of Charles and Caroline, from their childhoods, to their marriage, to their arrival in Pepin. Okay, well, it was mostly Charles’ childhood adventure that was detailed; Caroline’s life story was sparse. Was it because they were even more poor and left even less of a legacy?

What we know is that two families came to Wisconsin looking for something better. And for a while, there was something better. Pa was a farmer and he owned land near Concord. Then came the Civil War and the banks failed and there was rampant unemployment across Wisconsin. Farmers couldn’t sell their crops for a decent price. Charles lost his farm. It was around this time they went north to Pepin, where Caroline’s sister Martha and her husband lived. It seemed like a migration of the whole family.

But the migration may not have been completely driven by the economy. The Civil War was in full swing and the army was looking for “recruits.” Again, poverty plays into this. Wealthy men on the east coast were able to pay for substitutes to go to war for them. The men in Wisconsin feeling the effects of a bad economy were trying to come up with reasons why they couldn’t be spared at home, probably unsuccessfully. Charles, Fraser speculates, never enlisted and may have drifted through the wilds of Wisconsin to avoid being accounted for, along with hundreds if not thousands of other men and families. While you can’t fault Charles for not wanting to go to war, not after his brother-in-law died essentially from neglect in a hospital, it is a telling sign of his character that we see in both the Little House books and in biographies. Poverty is a part of Charles Ingalls’ DNA and he seems to always on the run, either to or from something.

We don’t know for sure what took Pa and Ma to Pepin, but they didn’t follow a road of lined with gold to get there. For many of us, the bigger question is why they left. In September, a group of LauraPalooza faithful sat outside the Wayside Cabin, seven miles outside of Pepin, wondering why on earth Pa would ever choose to leave this area. We saw how beautiful it was. We saw lots of farmland that appeared to be flourishing. We remember Little House in the Big Woods and the abundance of foods. What on earth happened that pushed him out of Pepin County?

We may never know what really happened during the Ingalls second go-round in the Little House, the time chronicled in that first book, and why they decided to leave. Poor people don’t leave detailed records. But history does. And history showed that for families like the Ingalls, things weren’t so great near Maiden Rock during and after the Civil War. Leaving may have been the only way to survive.

The Maiden Rock chapter isn’t Laura’s story; it’s her parents’ story. She’s born in this chapter, at the very end, moments before we learn that Charles and Caroline are preparing to make their first move as their own little family. This is not the story of Little House in the Big Woods. Rather, this is the chapter that shows you where Charles and Caroline came from, but literally and figuratively. This is the stage on which Laura’s foundation is built.

Posted in Caroline Quiner Ingalls (Ma), Charles Ingalls (Pa), Laura's Legacy, Little House in the Big Woods, Prairie Fires, Research, Writings About Laura Tagged with: ,

Prairie Fires Readalong – On The Frontier | Beyond Little House

At the beginning of “On the Frontier,” Caroline Fraser describes the Big Woods in a way that is reminiscent of Laura’s description at the beginning of “Little House in the Big Woods,” even including a quote from the book. However, Fraser gives us a little more information about the history of the area before Laura was born. The Dakota dominated the population of Minnesota until the flood of white settlers began in the 1800’s. Caroline Fraser gives a brief, detailed account of the seasonal lifestyle of the Dakota. Fraser’s description gives me the impression that the Dakota lived such harmonious and sustainable lives. They all stuck together and moved where needed with the changing seasons, weather, food sources, etc. The part of me that dreams of someday owning a tiny house, magically acquiring gardening skills, and putting those skills to use is envious.

Caroline Fraser continues with describing instances of the government taking advantage of the Dakota, forcing them away from the more desirable land that the government wanted for homesteading. Fraser goes on to describe the Homestead Act, which basically destroyed the Dakota way of life.  While the Dakota had to deal with the forces of nature and surely went through times of trial, I can imagine that they felt that the white settlers were pretty much destroying the world as they knew it as they barged in and stole their property.

Caroline Fraser mentions the German settlement of New Ulm and how the original settlers stole the Dakota’s bark houses while the Dakota were away on a hunting trip. I know I would be pretty furious if I returned from a trip to find someone else living in my house and the government told me, “Too bad. They’re more important than you. If you try to do anything about it, we’ll kill you.”

Caroline Fraser then describes the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back: the government was late with their annuity payment for the land “purchased” from the Dakota. This led the Dakota to go on a streak of killing, scalping, taking hostages, etc., including a battle at New Ulm where the Dakota killed a few hundred settlers.  The extreme anger the Dakota must have felt to commit such acts is, to me, unfathomable. My husband and I actually visited New Ulm during our first “Laura” trip in 2012. I would never have imagined that such a terrible event took place there. While we were only in New Ulm for less than 24 hours, I remember it being a warm and inviting place.  

Fraser mentions that, while Henry Hastings Sibley wanted to execute all 303 Dakota prisoners, Lincoln only agreed to the death sentences of 39. I can only imagine the horror of 39 people being executed in public while those in attendance cheered! At the same time, however, I imagine that if I were there at that time and my loved ones has been murdered by those being hanged, that I would probably feel that justice had been served. Still, it seems so gruesome today that such an act was public.

Fraser mentions that the remaining Dakota were forced into Dakota Territory and Nebraska. Oh, and when the late annuity payment owed to the Dakota finally did arrive, it was given to the settlers affected by the massacre. While the settlers were victims of such terrible acts by the Dakota, the Dakota were also very much victims themselves of the careless actions brought on by the Homestead Act.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t recall learning anything about the Minnesota Massacre when I was in school.  I had never heard of it until I dove deeper into my love of Laura Ingalls Wilder. In addition to the new information I gained from reading this chapter, I learned so much from reading the entire book. I hope you all enjoy it as much as I did, and bravo to Caroline Fraser for her amazing addition to LIW literature.

Posted in 150 Years of Laura Ingalls Wilder, Cultural Impact, Prairie Fires, Research, Writings About Laura

Prairie Fires Readalong – Introduction | Beyond Little House

Don’t you love a book that provides an immediate  emotional response and also  causes you to ponder questions from the very first sentence?  Caroline Fraser’s first sentence in Prairie Fires caused me to experience the grief over the loss of Caroline Ingalls, partially because I feel I knew her through her daughter’s words, and to feel empathy for the little girl/woman who called her “Ma”. 

Most of us cannot imagine receiving such news in a telegram, or not seeing our mothers for more than 20 consecutive years.  Why was this the case?  

Caroline Fraser (CF) points out that Laura was a woman bubbling over with emotions, feelings, opinions and memories, despite her reserved demeanor.  She found her outlet for this in her writing.  It is something for which we can all be grateful, because she gifted us with her prose.  

CF introduces us to a Laura, beyond the one we feel we know, presenting an intimate version of her for us, as if she were a back door friend, who popped over for a fireside chat.  She sheds light on Laura’s temperament and demeanor, not just the Laura we loved as a little girl for her enthusiasm for life, her innocent mischief, and her keen observations of her surroundings, that captured us as readers, but the mature and complex woman who is more mysterious. 

CF suggests we will be taken to dark corners of Laura’s memories, places we never expected to visit, and for some reason I cannot wait to go.  

We see hints that we will get to know Rose better, that elusive woman who had the privilege, (trial?) of calling Laura “Mother.”  CF confirms what we who have studied LIW eagerly have long suspected, that Rose was instrumental in the development and fruition of  the Little House series. Rose was a master of taking a germ of an idea for a story,  creating and embellishing it until it became a magical tale.  Without her, Laura may not have been able to take a childhood full of grim hardship, hunger and danger, and create the world we now know from her books. CF calls it epic and uplifting.  

 If I could have a chat with Laura today,  I would like to reassure her of a few things.  

  • Her hen raising skills are making a comeback. There are chicken coops now, even in urban settings, and cage free is the new standard.  
  • Voting has empowered women beyond her wildest dreams.  Women are voting, running for office, and leading.  
  • I would love to tell Laura that spring cleaning is, indeed, extinct for most of us.  
  • I would want her to know that thanks to her, so many of us have been inspired to read, write, never give up, and see the beauty in the small pleasures.  

What would you like to tell Laura? How would you reassure her, that her stories have endured, and that we are discussing them nearly 90 years after their inception. 

Near the end of her introduction in Prairie Fires, CF gracefully relates her family history to the Ingalls, proving that the theme of next year’s LIWLRA conference is apt.  All roads do lead to Laura.  

I suppose we can all do it.  I grew up in northeastern Ohio, where state route 14 runs right through it.  They do not link up, but Highway 14 in Wisconsin, Minnesota and South Dakota is known as the Laura Ingalls Wilder Historic Highway.  

Can you substitute your details into the iconic sentence we all recognize as the first introduction to the book that captured our imaginations?

I can.  

Once upon a time, sixty years ago a little girl lived near a small woods in Ohio in a little yellow house made of bricks.  

It is where my love of the tales of Laura Ingalls Wilder was nurtured.  

For me, the 60 years is accurate, for CF, not so many years, but it is apparent in this magnificent volume, we are kindred spirits.  

So, onward, to the rest of the compelling story.  

 -Judy Green, Former LIWLRA Board Member

Prairie Fires Readalong Introduction by Judy Green
Posted in Prairie Fires

Call for Proposals – LauraPalooza 2019 | Beyond Little House

LauraPalooza 2019 –
All Roads Lead to Laura

The Laura Ingalls Wilder
Legacy and Research Association Conference

We invite submissions of paper, panel, and workshop proposals for review and possible acceptance for presentation at the fifth LauraPalooza conference, to be held at the Stoney Creek Hotel & Conference Center in Onalaska, Wisconsin, on July 7-10, 2019. The conference will be followed by a field trip to Pepin, Wisconsin, on July 10.

The theme for the 2019 conference theme is “All Roads Lead to Laura.” The travels of the Ingalls and Wilder families take their enthusiasts literally journeying across the United States of America every year. Wilder devotees and scholars often note how her words and the lessons of the “Little House” weave themselves into everyday modern life. Connections to pioneer life and Wilder’s works are endless. It is fitting that we host our fifth conference where her life began, near the Big Woods and mighty Mississippi river of Wisconsin. Potential presenters are welcome to interpret the theme as they like. The conference timing also capitalizes on our association members who may want to travel to related sites in Burr Oak, Iowa, and Spring Valley, Minnesota. Conference-goers may want to consider traveling to Walnut Grove, Minnesota, for the 45th Anniversary and cast reunion of the Little House on the Prairie television series, an event separate from LIWLRA and LauraPalooza but certainly of interest to our members and attendees.

“LauraPalooza” embodies the community spirit, work ethic, and social interaction embraced by the Ingalls and Wilder families. Academic presentations mingle with Laura Ingalls Wilder Legacy Award recipients, ice cream socials, workshops, field trips, trivia contests, and more. Join scholars, writers, and professionals who specialize in Ingalls and Wilder literary, historical, and cultural impacts.

Topics may include:

• The broad influence Laura’s writings may have had on American culture in the last 100 years
• The history of the books and their cultural, educational, political, and social impact
• The influence of the Little House books on the towns that still exist today, including Pepin, Wisconsin
• The preservation of American folk music, food, and handwork
• The strategic and political influence of the timber industry, or hunting/trapping themes in American history
• The influence of trade on the Mississippi river in the upper Midwest
• The intersection of the Ingalls and Wilder families with Wisconsin’s culture and history
• The importance of family as portrayed in Little House in the Big Woods by sharing in work, gathering in celebration and passing stories/lessons to the next generation
• The long-term ramifications of the 1862 Homestead Act and westward expansion on American culture
• Historical racism and its lasting effects
• New discoveries in individual research that add to the legacies of Laura, the Ingalls family, and the Wilder family
• Any other way you might interpret the legacies of the Ingalls and Wilder families

Submit your proposal in the form of a 250 to 500 word abstract, outlining your idea and research, by the end of the day on Rose Wilder Lane’s birthday: December 5, 2018. All proposals should include a 200-word biography as would be appropriate for the conference program. Panel proposals should include biographies for all panelists and their topic of discussion. Workshop proposals should include an outline of the workshop curriculum and materials needed. Be sure to include all contact information.

Abstracts should be sent via email to Patty Collins, Conference Program Chair, at [email protected]. Acceptance notifications will be sent out via email on Laura Ingalls Wilder’s birthday: February 7, 2019. Those with accepted proposals will be expected to register for and attend the LauraPalooza 2019 conference.

More information about the conference, including logistical information such as meeting location and registration, featured speakers, and other announcements will be posted at www.beyondlittlehouse.com or find us on Facebook and Twitter @LIWLegacy.

Posted in Events, Laura's Legacy, LauraPalooza 2019, LIW-Related Items, Research Tagged with: