Musical Will Visit Tampa

Add Tampa, Florida, to the cities the musical will visit. It hits Tampa from March 2-7, 2010.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with:

Laura… a blogger?

I am an avid reader of numerous blogs.  I follow all Little House blogs, of course, because Little House is my passion and I want to read everything people have to say about it.  But outside of that, the blogs I like most to follow are those that begin with the telling of a personal happening — an event from the blogger’s day, something cute their child said, a dialogue they overheard — and turn it into a moral lesson.

One of the most interesting bloggers I know is a lady named Mrs. A.J. Wilder.  Only she doesn’t blog on the internet in 2009 (yet!). She was a columnist for the Missouri Ruralist during the nineteen teens and twenties.  Many of her articles read like a blog entry, though.  They relate a conversation she had with a friend, or a happening on the farm, or a story from her childhood.  She then neatly ties together the story into a moral lesson.

She imparts such wisdom that to live by her teachings would surely improve one’s relationships, one’s character, one’s life. And thus, we at Beyond Little House have invited Mrs. A.J. Wilder, better known as Laura Ingalls Wilder, to contribute to this blog. We trust that her words of wisdom will bless you each Sunday.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: ,

Ask the Experts: More on the Lore

In response to our “Ask the Experts” Q&A on the Laura Ingalls Wilder Lore, Gayle Keresey asks:

Is the three-ring binder of back issues still available? I thought when they came out with the compilation of the best of the articles that the three-ring binder option disappeared. If not, please tell me how I can order it. Thanks!
Gayle

Gayle, we’re happy to let you know that option to buy the three-ring binder of back issues is alive and well. I spoke to Diane at the Laura Ingalls Wilder Memorial Society in De Smet this morning, and she confirmed that the back-issue collection is available at a current price (as of March 2009) of $85, while the best-of compilation you mentioned is only $19.95. Call them to place your order.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: , , ,

Little House on the Prairie’s National Tour

Onstage I was falling in love with Laura every night. But the more I read, the more I fell in love with her in the books as well.

Kevin Massey, “Almanzo” in “Little House on the Prairie,” the musical

This lovely quote comes from a story in the Homesteader newsletter. Kevin was interviewed along with his co-star Kara Lindsay, who played Laura to his Almanzo at the Minneapolis run of the “Little House on the Prairie” musical last fall. (You can read the entire story in the Winter 2008-2009 issue.) As the person who conducted the interview, I have lots to say but will keep it to this: these two actors get Laura and Almanzo. I was more than ready to be critical of the musical, although I secretly hoped I wouldn’t have to be. Those hopes were realized. Instead of sighing in disappointment in the renowned (and very red) Guthrie Theater, I sighed in happiness and wished I’d drained my bank account to invest in another trip to Minneapolis.

As it turns out, I don’t have to. News is starting to trickle in regarding the upcoming national tour of the musical. The play will spend a month in New Jersey at the Paper Mill Playhouse from September 10 – October 10, then officially launch at the Ordway Theater in St. Paul, Minnesota on October 13 and remain there till the 25th. From then it’s 30 cities in the US and Canada. Among those announced are Denver (December 15-27), Toronto (likely January 2010), Houston (April 28-May 9), Tempe and Sacramento. We’ll keep you up to date at Beyond Little House as new cities are added.

It’s long been known that Melissa Gilbert will stay on as Ma, but it’s also now official that Kara Lindsay will continue as Laura (yippee!) and Steve Blanchard* will continue as Pa. The word seems to still be out on Kevin Massey—that is, the official word. But word on the street is that he’s in, too.

An official website on the traveling musical was launched a few months ago so it’s worth bookmarking, but so far we’ve yet to see an update.

* Steve as Pa? Hmm. Sounds pretty good overall, but there’s just one little line I’d like to talk to him about …

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: , , , , ,

Inside the Wilder Music Room at Rocky Ridge: “Annie Laurie” by John McCormack

Wilder Music Room At Rocky Ridge Farm

On a recent visit to Rocky Ridge Farm, I made note of the 78 rpm record that was on the electrola in the Wilder music room. According to the tour guide, the record was one of Laura’s favorite songs. The name of the record was “Annie Laurie,” sung by Irish Tenor John McCormack. The record was on the Victor 78 rpm Red Label. I found the actual recording on YouTube and the person who posted the recording says: “According to victor.library.ucsb.edu, it was recorded on March 4, 1910.” Here is the link to the Victor site with the info on the recording.


Lady John Scott (1810-1900) claimed authorship of the song.

Lady John Scott version

The earliest known version by Lady John was published by James Lindsay of Glasgow and is shown below:

Maxwelton’s braes are bonnie,
Where early fa’s the dew,
‘Twas there that Annie Laurie
Gi’ed me her promise true.

Gi’ed me her promise true –
Which ne’er forgot will be,
And for bonnie Annie Laurie
I’d lay me down and dee.

Her brow is like the snaw-drift,
Her neck is like the swan,
Her face it is the fairest,
That ‘er the sun shone on.

That ‘er the sun shone on –
And dark blue is her e’e,
And for bonnie Annie Laurie
I’d lay me down and dee.

Like dew on gowans lying,
Is the fa’ o’ her fairy feet,
And like winds, in simmer sighing,
Her voice is low and sweet.

Her voice is low and sweet –
And she’s a’ the world to me;
And for bonnie Annie Laurie
I’d lay me down and dee.

Notes:

* braes (a brae is a sloping bank of a river or sea-shore; a hill-slope)[1]

* bonnie means pretty

* fa’s means falls

* gi’ed means gave

* dee means die

* snaw means snow

* e’e means eyes

* gowans are daisies

* o is of

* simmer means summer

* a is all

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: ,

Ask the Experts: How Can I Subscribe To The Laura Ingalls Wilder Lore?

Dear Beyond Little House:

I love the new site and know that as time passes you will be adding that Laura feel to it.  Thank you for doing this.

I have a question for Ask the Experts. How can I subscribe to the Laura Ingalls Wilder Lore?  I cannot find a location.

Anita Gilley

Dear Anita:

Every once in a while I’ll be between reading material and my eyes will be drawn to the shelf of my “Laura” stuff. If I’ve got a nice stretch of time in front of me, I love to pull out my three-ring binder of Laura Ingalls Wilder Lore newsletters and spend an hour (or more!) absorbed in them.

The Lore is a four-page newsletter put out twice a year by the Laura Ingalls Wilder Memorial Society in De Smet, South Dakota. It was founded by Ingalls/Wilder biographer William Anderson back in 1975. He still edits it today. A subscription to the Lore is a companion part of the membership package in the Memorial Society. The pricing is three-tiered: $10 for one year, $25 for three years, and $500 for a lifetime membership. You can subscribe right on the Memorial Society’s site . The society also offers a three-ring binder of back issues at a current price of $85, and a best-of compilation for $19.95.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: , ,

Extraordinary Women

First, I want to join my colleagues in welcoming you all to “Beyond Little House.” I’m personally excited about a web space that we can all share our collective knowledge and interest in Laura and her world.

When I’m asked about my interest in Laura, I often start with the personal story of my family connection to the Ingalls. No, I’m not related. But my grandparents knew members of the Ingalls family in the area of Webster, Wis., very well, and one of Laura’s cousins, whom I knew as Ruby Martin, introduced herself to me when I was a small girl, reading “Little House in the Big Woods” in her living room while she visited with my grandma Elsie.

At the time, my six-year-old brain had difficulty with the concept that the little girl in the books could have such an “old” cousin. But I grasped an essential fact: the girl in the books lived a real life, like mine, and that meant all the “names” I learned in my history classes lived, too!

What heady stuff!

As I grew older, I soaked up everything I could read or find about Laura and Mary, their families, and the family stories I could glean from my grandmother. Oh, the missed opportunities I mourn now! I played with my very own rag doll, whom I named Mary, because I was the oldest sister and a blonde, too; I learned how to sew and knit and crochet because Laura did; I made bonnets and wrote poetry (badly) and gave oral reports about Laura in classes; I argued with school librarians who insisted on classifying the Little House books under “fiction.”

And a funny thing happened: I began thinking that if this remarkable person existed, other remarkable women existed, too.

My school librarians introduced me to Elizabeth Blackwell, Helen Keller, Abigail Adams, Jane Addams, Elizabeth I, and Joan of Arc. I immersed myself in the biographies of women and in women’s words. I emerged with a single thought: These women lived, and these women lived extraordinary lives.

Did that mean that I could live an extraordinary life, too?

It all started with Laura.

We underestimate the need for young women to engage with and discuss remarkable role models. And for many of us, Laura was our role model. She lived an ordinary life, but she had the courage and the encouragement of her family to push for the extraordinary, and accomplished much. The strength of Laura as a role model can be viewed in the accomplishments of her daughter, Rose, who attained international fame and respect in her time, having both that courage and the encouragement of her parents.

So when we share our love of Laura, we share a love of women as role models, and I hope, we offer ourselves as role models. Our young women need them. We all need to see that we do live extraordinary lives.

Amy Lauters

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: ,

Vacation Planner: Part 2 — Where Should I Go?

“I’m going on a Little House trip and was wondering which homesites I should visit?”  This is perhaps the most frequent — and yet the most difficult — question I am asked in regard to Little House vacation planning. The answer depends on many factors — where you live, your method of transportation, how much time you have, and your interest level. But here is some information to help you make your decision.

If you are passing through “Little House” territory and only have a short time, obviously you should choose the site you’re driving near. But if the purpose of your trip is primarily “Little House” oriented, my advice is to see as many of the sites as you possibly can.

Burke, New York, home of the Wilder family and setting for Farmer Boy, is the only site that is far removed from the others. It requires a trip of its own, unless you are traveling internationally and are planning to see most of the country while you’re here.

But all of the other “Little House” sites can be rolled into one vacation if you have the time — I’ve done it this way several times and it makes a great driving trip through the midwest. The other option many choose — and I’ve done both of these trips several times, as well — is to do all the northern midwestern sites as one trip, or to do the southern midwestern sites as one trip.

Here is a proposed schedule, allowing for the amount of time the typical family needs to feel like they’ve fully experienced a site. Note that you could switch things around a little, or do the schedule backward, depending on your location and situation, and that if you are short on time you could get away with spending a little less time at each site in order to fit them all in.  You could also lengthen the trip by adding sideline attractions as will be discussed in a future post.  There is enough information contained in the sample schedule to assist you in preparing your own itinerary and knowing about how much time to allot for various activities.

Day 1: Visit Pepin, Wisconsin (allow 2-3 hours); drive that evening to Burr Oak, Iowa. (approximately 2.5 hrs driving time)

Day 2: Spend the morning at Burr Oak (allow a couple hours), then drive to Walnut Grove, Minnesota, stopping at Spring Valley, Minnesota, on the way. (about 4 hrs driving time plus an hour or so to be spent in Spring Valley)

Day 3: Spend the whole day at Walnut Grove. If you go during pageant season (more on that in the next post!), see the pageant at Walnut Grove tonight. Otherwise, you may wish to get your drive to De Smet done during the evening hours to allow for more morning time spent there.

Day 4: Drive to De Smet (about 2 hrs; you may wish to stop for a half hour or so in Tracy, Minnesota, on the way). Spend the day here, and if it’s pageant season, see the pageant that night.

Day 5: You may need some more time in De Smet. If so, spend it.  Many people do De Smet in a day, but I personally think there are far too many activities here to cram into just one day, especially if you have children.  I would allow for at least a day and a half if possible. Whenever you’re ready to leave, start driving toward Independence, Kansas. The drive is a total of about 9.5 hrs.

Day 6: Finish your drive to Independence, visit the real Little House on the Prairie (allow about an hour here) and then drive on to Mansfield, Missouri. (about 3.5 hrs)

Day 7: Spend your day in Mansfield (most people will only need 3-4 hours here), then head for home. Depending on how far you got on Day 5 and how early you left Independence, you may be able to visit Mansfield during the afternoon of Day 6 and shorten your trip by a day.

As you can see, this tour requires a week plus the travel time you need to get to and from Wisconsin and Missouri, and if you’re dragging along those unwilling family members as I mentioned in a previous post, you may need to add another day or two for additional activities to appease them. (Fun family activities along the way will be the subject of a future post.) If you opted for a shorter trip, the northern trip would of course include Pepin, Burr Oak, Spring Valley, Walnut Grove, and De Smet; the southern trip would be Independence and Mansfield.

Some people balk at seeing the “smaller” sites. Yes, it is true, Mansfield, De Smet, and Walnut Grove definitely have the most “stuff” to offer visitors in terms of things to see and do. However, if you’re coming from some distance to see these bigger, more popular sites, we think it well worth the extra couple hours’ drive here and there to experience what the smaller sites have to offer. Each “Little House” site has its own charm, its own flavor, and to fully experience Laura’s life, you’ll want to visit them all if you possibly can.

To find out what each site has to offer, check out our Go Beyond page for links to each one. Figure out how many days you have available to travel, which sites you want to include in your trip, and stay tuned. Now that you know where you want to go, the next question you’ll need to answer before you can plan out the details is when should you go? I will address that in detail in my next vacation planning post!

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: , , , ,

Why Laura?

Mention “Little House on the Prairie” to most people and they’ll immediately think of the 1970s TV series starring Michael Landon. Or they’ll remember reading the books when they were kids. Or they’ll be like my voice teacher: give you a blank stare because they’ve never watched TV and children’s books about pioneering are apparently not intellectual enough to be on their radar.

Voice teacher aside, I find that most people have a passing knowledge of Little House and Laura Ingalls, although they might not know the names of any of the other books she wrote or have no idea she was a real person who lived the life she fictionalized in her books. They have no further interest and often wonder why I would. Why would an adult woman spend her free time reading and researching a little girl who lived in a log cabin over 130 years ago?

It’s a fair question, so let me try to explain.

First of all, yes, Laura Ingalls Wilder lived in a log cabin back in the 1870s, and it’s the pioneering aspect of the books that originally drew me to Laura. I loved the idea of sleeping on a trundle bed (well, until I knew exactly what that was), playing with a corncob doll, watching Pa smoke meat in a tree stump, drinking out of a little tin cup, making your own bread and butter and yes, playing with a pig’s bladder all blown up like a balloon. I couldn’t get enough of it. Essentially an only child, I had a lot of time to play on my own and use my imagination. When I was 11 or 12, perhaps long past the time I should have been playing Little House, we moved to an isolated house in the country on an acre of woods. There were no sidewalks to ride my bike on anymore, no swingsets or playhouses and no friends down the street. The woods became my playhouse, and Laura became my best friend. It was really easy to imagine I was living in a log cabin in the Big Woods when I was surrounded by trees.

When I was in high school, inspired by the success of the TV series, the Little House Cookbook was published, and I fell in love with the idea of baking my own bread from a sourdough starter and making pancake men for breakfast. I practically loved that cookbook to death (it was a thrill for me to finally meet the author last summer). I’ve tried most of the recipes in there. One I haven’t yet tried is Ox Tail soup, and that’s only because I only very recently learned where to buy ox tails.

But I guess that doesn’t explain why I’m still attached to — some would say obsessed with — Laura today. Am I still a pioneer girl wannabe? I chuckle at the thought. You would too if you could see me. Somehow I doubt that pioneer is the word that comes to people’s minds when they meet me. I don’t have long hair kept in a braid, I don’t wear calico dresses, my biscuits resemble hockey pucks and I haven’t baked my own bread in years. I like to think of myself as rather trendy and quite modern (with a retro sensibility) so while the log cabin/pioneering stuff is still interesting to me, it’s not what draws me to Laura anymore.

During the 70s I discovered a biography of Laura. For the first time I saw pictures of the real Laura — and the real Pa with his very scary beard. Laura stopped being a character in a series of books and became a real person, a person who grew up and lived a full life. I wanted to know more about this person. What happened to her after the books ended and she and Almanzo, the boy hero of the series, rode off into the sunset and set up housekeeping in their little gray house in the west? Did they live happily ever after? Did they have lots of children? Did they live in South Dakota forever? The fact that the answer to each of these questions was “no” didn’t stop me from wanting to dig further. Laura became real to me and I liked the person she became.

Even more than that, I admired her. Laura Ingalls Wilder had grit and determination and she needed every bit of that determination to make it through the trials of her first years of adulthood with illness, drought, poverty, fire and death dogging her heels. She and Almanzo moved around quite a bit in the first ten years of marriage, trying to find the place where they belonged. They finally found it in the Ozark hills of Missouri. But even then life wasn’t easy and Laura spent her 30s taking care of boarders in town while helping her husband clear and build up their 200 acres of farmland right outside of the town limits.

In her 40s, with an established farming business and her dream home finally becoming a reality, she embarked on a new career — writer. But not as the author of her famous book series; that would come much later. She became a published newspaper and magazine writer, finding fame in her local environment, leaving national fame to her globe-trotting daughter. Laura’s articles, full of homespun farm wisdom, still resonate with me today. I can frequently find the perfect quote to match what’s going on in our world from articles that were written almost 100 years ago. Now that’s good writing. I am inspired by her change of career so relatively late in life; now that I’m in my 40s I hope to follow in her footsteps. In fact I frequently use her as a way to buck myself up: “Laura didn’t even start writing till her 40s and look where that took her….so it’s not too late for you.”

“Book” Laura had few possessions. When she married and moved in with Almanzo, she barely filled up one trunk with all her wordly goods — a quilt, old rag doll, china box, and a couple of dresses. I definitely don’t relate to that girl. However, I’ve been to Laura’s house in Missouri and I’ve seen all the stuff she ended up with. ;-) Laura liked stuff. She especially liked dishes and there are at least four sets of good china on display in her house and at the museum adjacent to it. That’s not even counting the everyday dishes and the depression glass sets. Girlfriend had a serious dish collecting addiction. As the daughter of a dish addict who has shown definite tendencies myself, I can completely identify, and I love her for it. From what I understand, she loved fashion, too, along with jewelry and accessories. You can see hints of it in her books when she goes into great detail about each of her dresses and hats. Now that’s a woman after my own heart!

In her 60s, when she and Almanzo were starting to think about retirement from the drudgery of farm work (or maybe they didn’t think it was drudgery; I could be projecting my own lazy opinion there), another career, the best career, was right around the corner. The Depression hit them hard because their nest egg had been invested in a fund that went belly up during the stock market crash (sound familiar to anyone?) and their daughter Rose encouraged her mother to write down memories of her pioneer childhood and attempt to get it published in order to make extra money. No one was interested in the adult memoir, but when the material was reworked into a series of children’s books, they struck literary gold. Children of the 1930s loved hearing about little Laura and Mary’s adventures — first in the Big Woods of Wisconsin and later on the prairies of Kansas, Minnesota and South Dakota. Suddenly, Mrs. A. J. Wilder of Mansfield, Missouri, became Laura Ingalls Wilder of the world. I can’t even imagine what it must have felt like to go from local farm wife to international superstar but I suspect she had a lot of fun with it. A lifetime of frugality gave way now that money was no longer a constant problem and worry. This is actually when she started most of her dish collection, I believe, and it must have been so much fun to finally indulge and order anything she wanted from the wish book.

She churned out book after book during the 1930s and 40s until she finally brought “book” Laura’s childhood to a close at the age of 18. She and Almanzo had left the Dakota prairies in defeat, only too happy to say goodbye to the wide open spaces and the eternal wind and drought that had ripped their dreams apart. But I like to believe that she recaptured her early love of the prairie while writing her books, remembering the beauty of seeing the sun set behind the far-off hills and gathering violets and wild roses by the armful during the Sunday afternoon buggy rides with her beau. If she didn’t recapture all that emotion, she did a wonderful job of faking it through her writing because she instilled that love in me and I never even saw the prairie until I was an adult.

And that’s the main reason I love Laura — her words. They paint pictures in my mind and inspire me every day. I am fascinated by how an ordinary girl could become an extraordinary woman who made a rich life out of what most people would consider very little. I love how she didn’t give up, how she didn’t stick to the role prescribed for her by society in the mid-years of the 20th century, but rather forged her own path and by doing so, touched the lives of millions of people around the world.

Really, when you think of it, why wouldn’t I spend my free time reading and researching about Laura? I’m only surprised that everybody else isn’t doing it as well!

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: ,

How Cute Are These?

Chris at Book Hunters’ Holiday alerted her blog readers to these utterly too-too dollhouse-sized sets of Little House books at Miniature Bookshelf, which she cleverly dubbed “The Half-Pint Edition.” Sewell-illustrated! I haven’t ordered mine yet, but Rebecca tells me that when she ordered hers, she got an unexpected discount in her shopping cart, paying in total just $16 plus shipping for an item that lists at $22.99. Maybe you’ll be as lucky! Those who want to order can do so online or by calling 877.893.6280.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with: ,